<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No need for Level of Assurance level 1 and thus OpenID for e-government?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maarten.wegdam.name/2009/10/01/no-need-for-level-of-assurance-level-1-and-thus-openid-for-e-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maarten.wegdam.name/2009/10/01/no-need-for-level-of-assurance-level-1-and-thus-openid-for-e-government/</link>
	<description>A blog on identity, privacy, trust, middleware and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:06:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levels of assurance, per attribute &#171; Maarten Wegdam&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://maarten.wegdam.name/2009/10/01/no-need-for-level-of-assurance-level-1-and-thus-openid-for-e-government/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Levels of assurance, per attribute &#171; Maarten Wegdam&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maarten.wegdam.name/?p=33#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] attributes. This is similar to the levels of assurance concept as standardized by NIST (see also a previous post of mine on this), and used by e.g. the EU STORK project. However, level of assurance refers to the identity as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attributes. This is similar to the levels of assurance concept as standardized by NIST (see also a previous post of mine on this), and used by e.g. the EU STORK project. However, level of assurance refers to the identity as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maarten Wegdam</title>
		<link>http://maarten.wegdam.name/2009/10/01/no-need-for-level-of-assurance-level-1-and-thus-openid-for-e-government/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Maarten Wegdam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maarten.wegdam.name/?p=33#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Peter, you are right, I did have C2G in mind, not C2C facilitated by the government. I guess you&#039;d probably would want to make sure that the government cannot easily find out who the citizins are in such a case. OpenID could be used here, with as main requirement that pseudonyms are support by the IdP/OP. The remainder of the OpenID government profile, and the need for a trust provider, and less obvious to me for a C2C use case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, you are right, I did have C2G in mind, not C2C facilitated by the government. I guess you&#8217;d probably would want to make sure that the government cannot easily find out who the citizins are in such a case. OpenID could be used here, with as main requirement that pseudonyms are support by the IdP/OP. The remainder of the OpenID government profile, and the need for a trust provider, and less obvious to me for a C2C use case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Valkenburg</title>
		<link>http://maarten.wegdam.name/2009/10/01/no-need-for-level-of-assurance-level-1-and-thus-openid-for-e-government/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Valkenburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maarten.wegdam.name/?p=33#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Interesting!  Regarding the use of openid for governement, the question is, however, if the only application is G2C, or also interaction between citizens facilitated by government.  Think about, e.g., citizen dicussion fora.  For this sort of thing lower levels of trust (combined with more privacy) might be interesting as well as solving issues with the scale and adoption of cross-European identity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting!  Regarding the use of openid for governement, the question is, however, if the only application is G2C, or also interaction between citizens facilitated by government.  Think about, e.g., citizen dicussion fora.  For this sort of thing lower levels of trust (combined with more privacy) might be interesting as well as solving issues with the scale and adoption of cross-European identity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
