<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet identity solutions: 3, 3.5 or 4 parties?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maarten.wegdam.name/2010/07/19/internet-identity-solutions-3-3-5-or-4-parties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maarten.wegdam.name/2010/07/19/internet-identity-solutions-3-3-5-or-4-parties/</link>
	<description>A blog on identity, mobile, privacy, innovation, trust, middleware and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Position paper on digital identity from Thuiswinkel.org (Dutch online retail association) &#171; Maarten Wegdam&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://maarten.wegdam.name/2010/07/19/internet-identity-solutions-3-3-5-or-4-parties/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Position paper on digital identity from Thuiswinkel.org (Dutch online retail association) &#171; Maarten Wegdam&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maarten.wegdam.name/?p=113#comment-318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Choice for online retailers between several providers that each provide universal access to identities, also internationally My comment: this seemed a bit naive, that there will be several providers that can provide universal access. But checking the explanation in the position paper itself made is clear that they refer to intermediate brokers between the online retailers and the identity providers. These may make life easier, see a previous post on 3 vs 3.5 vs 4 party models. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Choice for online retailers between several providers that each provide universal access to identities, also internationally My comment: this seemed a bit naive, that there will be several providers that can provide universal access. But checking the explanation in the position paper itself made is clear that they refer to intermediate brokers between the online retailers and the identity providers. These may make life easier, see a previous post on 3 vs 3.5 vs 4 party models. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

