http://maarten.wegdam.name A blog on identity, privacy, trust, middleware and more Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:06:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://maarten.wegdam.name/2010/04/20/network-approach-to-e-identification-erecogition/#comment-97 Internet identity solutions: 3, 3.5 or 4 parties? « Maarten Wegdam's Blog Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:06:17 +0000 http://maarten.wegdam.name/?p=103#comment-97 [...] Broker – similar to the hub architecture, but there is more than one hub (allowing competition between them), as used by for example eHerkenning (eRecognition). [...] [...] Broker – similar to the hub architecture, but there is more than one hub (allowing competition between them), as used by for example eHerkenning (eRecognition). [...]

]]> http://maarten.wegdam.name/2010/03/11/user-centric-saml/#comment-80 Tweets that mention User-centric SAML? « Maarten Wegdam's Blog -- Topsy.com Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:42:06 +0000 http://maarten.wegdam.name/?p=88#comment-80 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mike Waddingham, Paul. Paul said: "Using mockups he asked users if they wanted control, and if so, if they prefer user-centric SAML or InfoCards" http://bit.ly/cke2n5 [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mike Waddingham, Paul. Paul said: "Using mockups he asked users if they wanted control, and if so, if they prefer user-centric SAML or InfoCards" http://bit.ly/cke2n5 [...]

]]> http://maarten.wegdam.name/2010/01/08/mobile-pki-and-mobile-centric-identity/#comment-53 wireless security Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:05:51 +0000 http://maarten.wegdam.name/?p=72#comment-53 this is going on my twitter now cheers :). this is going on my twitter now cheers .

]]> http://maarten.wegdam.name/2009/10/01/no-need-for-level-of-assurance-level-1-and-thus-openid-for-e-government/#comment-48 Levels of assurance, per attribute « Maarten Wegdam's Blog Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:54:33 +0000 http://maarten.wegdam.name/?p=33#comment-48 [...] attributes. This is similar to the levels of assurance concept as standardized by NIST (see also a previous post of mine on this), and used by e.g. the EU STORK project. However, level of assurance refers to the identity as [...] [...] attributes. This is similar to the levels of assurance concept as standardized by NIST (see also a previous post of mine on this), and used by e.g. the EU STORK project. However, level of assurance refers to the identity as [...]

]]> http://maarten.wegdam.name/2009/10/01/no-need-for-level-of-assurance-level-1-and-thus-openid-for-e-government/#comment-4 Maarten Wegdam Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:22:10 +0000 http://maarten.wegdam.name/?p=33#comment-4 Peter, you are right, I did have C2G in mind, not C2C facilitated by the government. I guess you'd probably would want to make sure that the government cannot easily find out who the citizins are in such a case. OpenID could be used here, with as main requirement that pseudonyms are support by the IdP/OP. The remainder of the OpenID government profile, and the need for a trust provider, and less obvious to me for a C2C use case. Peter, you are right, I did have C2G in mind, not C2C facilitated by the government. I guess you’d probably would want to make sure that the government cannot easily find out who the citizins are in such a case. OpenID could be used here, with as main requirement that pseudonyms are support by the IdP/OP. The remainder of the OpenID government profile, and the need for a trust provider, and less obvious to me for a C2C use case.

]]> http://maarten.wegdam.name/2009/10/01/no-need-for-level-of-assurance-level-1-and-thus-openid-for-e-government/#comment-3 Peter Valkenburg Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:40:11 +0000 http://maarten.wegdam.name/?p=33#comment-3 Interesting! Regarding the use of openid for governement, the question is, however, if the only application is G2C, or also interaction between citizens facilitated by government. Think about, e.g., citizen dicussion fora. For this sort of thing lower levels of trust (combined with more privacy) might be interesting as well as solving issues with the scale and adoption of cross-European identity. Interesting! Regarding the use of openid for governement, the question is, however, if the only application is G2C, or also interaction between citizens facilitated by government. Think about, e.g., citizen dicussion fora. For this sort of thing lower levels of trust (combined with more privacy) might be interesting as well as solving issues with the scale and adoption of cross-European identity.

]]> http://maarten.wegdam.name/2009/09/24/first-post/#comment-2 Maarten Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:19:06 +0000 #comment-2 This is to test the comments features, please ignore. This is to test the comments features, please ignore.

]]>